Discours critique sur les œuvres de littérature contemporaine
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédente | |||
oeuvres:la_deuxieme_mort_de_ramon_mercader [2016/10/24 22:46] – Audrey Thériault | oeuvres:la_deuxieme_mort_de_ramon_mercader [2016/10/25 13:58] (Version actuelle) – Audrey Thériault | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 6: | Ligne 6: | ||
« Sous son activité de directeur adjoint d'une société espagnole de commerce, Ramón Mercader cache sa véritable identité et sa mission d' | « Sous son activité de directeur adjoint d'une société espagnole de commerce, Ramón Mercader cache sa véritable identité et sa mission d' | ||
- | À travers son héros | + | À travers son héros |
===== Documentation critique ===== | ===== Documentation critique ===== | ||
Ligne 48: | Ligne 48: | ||
### **Abstract** | ### **Abstract** | ||
- | The first chapter is introduced by a synopsis of the French Literary Prizes, their origins, evolution and rivalries. | + | The first chapter is introduced by a synopsis of the French Literary Prizes, their origins, evolution and rivalries. The second chapter is an historical review from the creation of Goncourt and Femina and other great prizes, the Grand Prix du Roman, Renaudot, Interallie and Medicis, until 1960. The third chapter goes directly into the chosen decade with historical environment and literary studies about ten award-winning novels : (1) 1961: Henri Thomas, //Le Promontoire// |
- | The second chapter is an historical review from the creation of Goncourt and Femina and other great prizes, the Grand Prix du Roman, Renaudot, Interallie and Medicis, until 1960. | + | The presentation of the Femina Committee appears in a fourth chapter with several statements obtained from some of the ladies who took part in the committee and an inquiry made as to those people who form the jury now, as well as the General Secretary. The mechanisms of voting and their opinions about literary matter are also explained. The fifth chapter shows a sociological view about the novel and its public, editorial politics, relationships between the critic and the prizes, besides the existence in the decade of two phenomena like the " |
- | + | ||
- | The third chapter goes directly into the chosen decade with historical environment and literary studies about ten award-winning novels: (1) 1961: Henri Thomas, //Le Promontoire// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The presentation of the Femina Committee appears in a fourth chapter with several statements obtained from some of the ladies who took part in the committee and an inquiry made as to those people who form the jury now, as well as the General Secretary. The mechanisms of voting and their opinions about literary matter are also explained. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The fifth chapter shows a sociological view about the novel and its public, editorial politics, relationships between the critic and the prizes, besides the existence in the decade of two phenomena like the " | + | |
- | + | ||
- | This work concludes by revealing relations between the sociological aspects treated and the literary fact of Femina Prizes. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Finally, a group of eight indices compliment the previous information. ### | + | |
JOHNSON, Kathleen Ann, « From History to Painting in Contemporary Fiction : Temporal and Spatial Models in Novels of Butor, Simon and Semprún », thèse de doctorat, University of California (Irvine), 1984, 236 f. +++ Thèse de doctorat / mémoire de maîtrise | JOHNSON, Kathleen Ann, « From History to Painting in Contemporary Fiction : Temporal and Spatial Models in Novels of Butor, Simon and Semprún », thèse de doctorat, University of California (Irvine), 1984, 236 f. +++ Thèse de doctorat / mémoire de maîtrise | ||
Ligne 70: | Ligne 60: | ||
This study proposes to open a needed critical perspective on both the terms and efficacity of these spatial models. Chapter One introduces the space/time problem through a reading of // | This study proposes to open a needed critical perspective on both the terms and efficacity of these spatial models. Chapter One introduces the space/time problem through a reading of // | ||
- | Chapters Four and Five investigate the alternatives proposed by the Marxist Jorge Semprún for whom spatial models are a critique but an ineffective complication of linear narrative. In //Le grand voyage//, the attempt to narrate historical loss and negativity without suppression leads to the need to open temporal linearity from within by complicating space. //La deuxième mort de Ramon Mercader// explores this spatial complication by showing vision to be a complicated construct in which vision disrupts, complicates and is complicated by discourse. | + | Chapters Four and Five investigate the alternatives proposed by the Marxist Jorge Semprún for whom spatial models are a critique but an ineffective complication of linear narrative. In //Le grand voyage//, the attempt to narrate historical loss and negativity without suppression leads to the need to open temporal linearity from within by complicating space. //La deuxième mort de Ramón |
This dissertation recognizes the tension between spatial and temporal models to be both interesting and productive and argues for a critical perspective which resists resolution in terms of either space or time. ### | This dissertation recognizes the tension between spatial and temporal models to be both interesting and productive and argues for a critical perspective which resists resolution in terms of either space or time. ### | ||
Ligne 86: | Ligne 76: | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
<pagemod add_ref>## | <pagemod add_ref>## |